THE WORLD ECONOMY GOES TROUBLE DUE TO INEFFICIENCY
Buttonwood
Take it easy
Economies
are too weak for normal monetary policy to resume
THIS was supposed to be the year when monetary policy started to
get back to normal. Seven years after Lehman Brothers collapsed, central banks
were expected to edge away from a policy of near-zero interest rates. But now,
with the year almost over, the Federal Reserve has yet to push up rates while
other rich-world central banks are focused more on easing than on tightening.
Sweden’s Riksbank
extended its quantitative easing (QE) programme on October 28th. Mario Draghi,
the president of the European Central Bank, has indicated that further easing
may come in December, probably by adjusting the pace, scale or type of asset
purchases in its QE regime. More than two-fifths of economists polled by
Bloomberg forecast that the Bank of Japan would pick up the pace of its
monetary easing on October 30th, after The Economist went to press. Even if policy is kept unchanged, the bank plans
to expand the money supply at an annual rate of ¥80 trillion ($664 billion).
The picture in the emerging markets is more mixed. Capital
Economics calculates that, on balance, slightly more emerging central banks
have been tightening than cutting. But China cut interest rates on October
23rd, the sixth reduction in the last year. India unveiled a
half-percentage-point rate cut in late September.
The attitude of central banks reflects their worries about
economic growth. The IMF just lowered its global growth forecast to 3.1% for
2015, with cuts applying to both advanced and developing economies. Inflation
is also low in Europe, North America and Asia, giving central banks more
freedom to be supportive.
The benign interest-rate outlook is one reason why equities have
recovered from the wobbles they suffered in August and September. As of October
28th, the S&P 500 index had regained nearly all the ground lost in the
previous two months (see chart). Futures markets indicate that investors do not
expect the first Fed hike until next year, although that may change after the
Fed’s open market committee removed a previous reference to global economic
risks in its October statement.
The other main reason why markets have rallied is a more
sanguine view of the Chinese economy. Official figures for third-quarter GDP
showed growth of 6.9% and, although some have doubts about the data, it was
noticeable that the IMF did not downgrade its forecast for Chinese growth in
its latest global outlook.
But the optimism should not be taken too far. Other market
indicators still suggest investors are worried about sluggish growth and
deflation. Bloomberg’s commodity index is down by more than a quarter over the
past 12 months. The yield on the ten-year Treasury bond is hovering around 2%,
not a level that suggests investors expect normal levels of economic growth to
return any time soon.
American companies are also struggling to maintain the robust
profit growth they have shown since 2009. While third-quarter profits for
S&P 500 companies are marginally ahead of expectations (as is usually the
case), they are still likely to be 4% lower than they were a year ago; sales
will probably fall by 3%.
It is simply hard to keep pushing up profits when global GDP
growth is subdued. The number of American companies citing a slowing global
economy as affecting their profits and revenues is more than 50% higher than a
year ago, according to Thomson Reuters. The news is no better in Europe, where
third-quarter profits are expected to be down 5.4% on the year, with revenues
dropping 7.9%.
So the equity markets are caught in something of an awkward
equilibrium. Positive economic news will make the outlook for profits more rosy
but will also mean that the Fed is more likely to push up rates. And bad
economic news may mean a respite from monetary tightening but is still bad
news.
This explains the rather bumpy ride that stockmarkets have had
in 2015. The lack of profit growth makes it hard for markets to surge ahead
(the MSCI world index is back around its end-2014 level). But without higher
interest rates, or evidence that big economies are slipping into outright
recession, share prices are unlikely to collapse.
Equities may be following the path of government bonds, which
have been stuck in a narrow trading range for a while. Central banks may have
helped stockmarkets in an era of low growth by making other assets less
attractive; the result was a positive shift in share valuations. But slow
growth hasn’t gone away. For equity investors, it was better to travel
hopefully than to arrive.
Comments
Post a Comment